Lump-sum indemnification clauses are not necessarily a common practice, but such provisions are worth noting here, as they were not taken directly in Ohio as part of a breach of the non-compete obligation. Kidney & Hypertension Specialists Chillicothe v. Adena Health Sys., Franklin C.P. No. 12CVH-15862, 2014 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 9317, at *18 (May 6, 2014) (dismissed a summary motion requesting that a lump sum provision for damages in a non-competition clause not be applied on the basis of lack of jurisdiction). A lump sum damages clause provides that in the event of a material infringement, the infringer is held liable, upon request, for a specified amount, in addition to actual damages and claims for omission. Be careful with these types of provisions – you may be on the recipient`s side if the provision is mutually applicable to the parties. Careful consideration should be made of whether the inclusion of a lump-sum compensation clause is appropriate. The courts have generally recognized three main employer interests: (1) trade secrets learned during employment; (2) confidential business information; and (3) “goodwill”; That is, appropriating an employer`s reputation or relationship with clients or clients to your own advantage. The interests of employers outside these well-defined categories should not be enforceable. When the employer requests the termination of the contract of destroyer of competition during the period of contestation of competition, the People`s Court supports this request.
When, upon termination of the contract for the destruction of competition, the worker asks the employer to pay compensation of an additional 3 months from competition, the People`s Court supports this claim. The basic idea that was put forward a long time ago remains the following: “The obligation not to compete can only be applied if it is necessary to protect a legitimate commercial interest, which is sufficiently limited in time and time and which is at the origin of the public interest”.  When selling a business, it is typical for a buyer to repeat in a contract of sale the requirement that the seller not carry on the same type of activity in a given geographic area for a certain period of time. . . .